|
FEATURED STORIES:
|
|---|
|
looking back-
from PWWF to WSF and beyond. . . Part I | by Nicole Jaquis - February 19, 2004 | I reached New Delhi on Saturday, January
10th; just two days before the People’s World Water Forum, a three-day
conference on water privatization and conservation and a precursor to
the World Social Forum held the following days in Mumbai. I had only the
weekend to re-orientate myself with the area, struggling to navigate and
lead my co-pilot (and first timer in India) Cindy, through the new Metro
construction around Connaught Place; barely enough time to ignore the
jet lag, get a cell phone, a weighty box that would serve as a voltage
converter, and round up the rest of our crew (Shalini coming from NYC,
via Madras, and Saugat coming from Faridabad, the suburbs just outside
South Delhi.
I’m almost embarrassed to admit
the jet lag got the best of me and I think I slept through the majority
of the Water Forum; good thing we were recording. Highlights I do remember
were interviewing Dr.Vandana Shiva of India and Maude Barlowe of Canada,
both world-renowned authors and activists. Other synchronicities (reminding
us we are all on the right path) included meeting Nia, water activist
and real-life incarnation of a fictional character (with the same name)
Shalini scripted for an upcoming sci-fi film. (You just had to be there
it was truly uncanny). Anyway, immediately after the Water Forum Shalini,
Cindy and I headed on the “Rajdhani Express” overnight train
to Mumbai, having sent Saugat ahead with the “water brigade”
the prior evening.
By now I should have been used to the
time zone, but I still was not sleeping properly. Conferences at the World
Social Forum began promptly at 9am. We were staying a good 45 minutes
to an hour by local train from the Forum site, practically different places
each night. Most late evenings were spent mingling among the lingering
crowds at Nesco Grounds, listening, over sips of (environmentally-unfriendly
plastic) cups of chai, to people’s stories of why they came, how
far they traveled, and what NGO or social/ environmental/ anti-globalization
movement they represented. Days were spent wandering the approximate few
square kilometers of crowded noisy roadways between (surprisingly) un-crowded
conference and exhibit Halls; eventually retreating to the air-conditioned
lap-top room, in which we ultimately set up daily residence, with the
lofty intention of attempting to post semi-life broadcasts of the Forum’s
events. (Having been to India twice before as well as having gone last
year to the third WSF in it’s birthplace, Porto Alegre, Brazil,
I know how chaotic things can get, how nothing really goes to plan and
thus should have known better.)
In any event, I could not help but have
some expectations, at least some curiosities about how things would be
set up here in Mumbai, which countries and what issues will be represented
and discussed. Foremost differences were in the layout. In Brazil the
Forum was spread out among the city; events were held at a college campus,
a soccer stadium, an outdoor amphitheater, and a loading dock. Activists
were seen everywhere. Rallies were held outside on the street, out in
public, not only with police escorts, but also beer and water vendors
on the sidelines quenching the thirst of thousands of activists marching
together as if they were all part of the same movement (that is of being
Human), all part of the same country (that is of Earth). The residents
of Porto Alegre could not help but get exposed to the issues on the table
at the Forum. New channels, both cable and local networks broadcasted
events throughout the day and night. Newspapers printed stories and photos
on front pages as well as in multi-page supplemental inserts. After all
(from my limited experience it seems) Brazilians are proud of their activists,
not embarrassed by them as they are here in India.
On a typical day in Porto Alegre, you
might arrive at PUC searching the entire college campus only to find the
conference or workshop you planned to attend has been moved to the loading
docks on the other side of town. Now you are stuck in traffic riding the
same circular bus route and perhaps a bit irritated. However in that 40
minute ride, you are not only exposing the public to what ever propaganda
sign you may be carrying, or t-shirt you may have made or bought from
one of the many entrepreneur al street vendors, but also getting the chance
to converse with whom ever you are squashed against in that crowded bus.
Thus one can’t help but share their ideas, have a bit of cultural
exchange, and experience the positive aspects of global networking.
In Mumbai, the 4th World Social Forum
was essentially contained in one area, even the street vendors had designated
areas. In retrospect this made the spread-out-set-up in Porto Alegre seem
more affective in involving the public. The Indian government, no doubt
enticed by the very same Multinational Corporations against which they
must have been anticipating protesting, seemed to have designed the WSF
layout with one thing in mind: let them have their event here, but let’s
keep everything hush, hush. Nesco Grounds became a well-secured safe zone
for protesters, or “money lacking NGO whiners” as one local
paper put it. Armed policemen surrounded the grounds, just to keep the
activists contained inside tall, cloth-covered bamboo walls, to prevent
any public disturbance; in essence preventing the word from getting out.
Ask anyone on the streets outside the Forum, and they didn’t even
know what WSF was, much less that was happening right in their own backyard.
Rickshaw wallas knew that any foreigner getting off the train at Goregoan
was going to Nesco Grounds, but that didn’t necessarily mean he
understood for what or why.
Essentially activists inside Nesco Grounds
were left only preaching to the choir. Everyone there wanted to be there;
it was in their best interested to be there. Everyone left inside had
issues to discuss, propaganda to share, and actually wanted to create
this other possible world. However their seclusion from those right outside
made their efforts fruitless. Rallies were not a collective march of global
movements blocking street traffic and encouraging bystanders to join in
the chanting; but tiny clusters of well costumed Adi Vasis dancing in
a circles to the sounds of their traditional drums and horns, or Japanese
students wearing identical t-shirts expressing their disgust with the
activities of the US government, or Tibetan monks baring their own flags
of a promised future of freedom, all in close quarters and bumping into
each other. Demonstrators were allotted few makeshift streets on which
to traverse back and fourth, inside the grounds. One could stand in a
single spot, viewing several repeat performances, but due to the chaos
of multilingual noise, not be able to hear them selves think, much less
share ideas with others. Easily distracted by the ornate costumes, the
loud drums and the many dancing bodies, it was often difficult to motivate,
go inside and hear a lecture, actually listen to someone speak rationally,
rather than repeatedly yell slogans. Apparently a common phenomenon, for
I found finding seats was unfortunately never a problem. All the action
remained outside the conferences halls yet not far enough outside to make
any impact on the public.
Aside from the structural enclosure,
the lack of proper media coverage also contributed to the word staying
among the left inside. Most of the coverage remained on the internet,
via indi-media organizations, their stories contributed by volunteer journalists.
And unless one is aware of these indi-media urls, those reading their
news from MSNBC.com or NDTV here in India, would never come to know. Local
and National Indian newspapers and TV networks barely broke the surface
at the Forum, almost afraid of the influence of the left. Instead of in-depth
articles on rights for sex-workers in India, or land reform and water
privatization issues throughout their country, English newspapers wrote
blurbs about which celebrities showed up and how the westerners were handling
the spicy Indian cuisine served by the very same food vendors, who were
selling 15 rupee water bottled by Pepsi-co. In essence making the whole
affair a big joke among the right.
Several weeks of digesting and I still
question what was actually being accomplished here in Mumbai. If the original
organizers in Porto Alegre had any idea how their dreams would follow
through, in someone else’s hands. How an event of such controversy
would go down in another country, with different standards of censorship,
and people in the midst of Privatization and quickly becoming illusioned
by the Corporate Elite, that bringing in Subway and their own brand of
Starbucks is progress.
Just not sure where to go from here.
. .
|